This is what I thin, Well its kind of difficult to explain I would like to give a psychic reading to ANY ONE who will listen my phone # is provided I would like to tell some one what I think maybe theye can help me make sense of this and I will tell them where I think this body might be I need help with this..

U see im new at this psychic stuff im not known but I can’t deny I just had a lot of info come to me and im not sure why I will throw this out there O.K

I see lots of abuse
lots of guilt I hear it was the wrong man !!! kaylee was from the wrong man I hear her say

The dad play’s a bigger role in his and again I havn’t read the article so I might be wrong there

Some one email me bak xoxo Dave zonkou@yahoo.com

T O T M O M IS G U I L T Y !!!!!!!!!

The heading of my last posting was supposed to have been friendly in nature, and certainly wasn’t meant as an insult, so I apologize if you took it the wrong way. I certainly respect your observations and opinions.

I was never aware that the authorities requested an article belonging to the late Jesus Ortiz. I only read that his family themselves were interested, in the beginning at least, to learn whether Caylee might have been their biological granddaughter. Since then, I’ve not heard anything regarding the matter, other than the fact that his family asked that their privacy be respected. You must have learned something that I missed. Can you fill me in, please?

Thanks.

Several weeks back there were several reports about LE showing interest in obtaining DNA from Jesus Ortiz. They certainly contacted his parents.

So it is not totally irrelevant, although, as you say, it is probably irrelevant to finding her body.

PS Ginger
Cindy and George both work so I would assume they were at work at that time. Remember when Casey/Caylee left on the 16th George was watching his show between 12:30 and 1:00 before leaving to work and Cindy was long gone to work by that time.

None of the information you cite is inculpatory evidence of Cindy Anthony’s guilt. Cindy Anthony is simply being a grandmother. Clearly you are not one. I would cling to every false sighting, indeed any hope that my precious granddaughter might still be alive.

Review the 911 and the jail recordings. She is the one who refused to allow Casey to buy another day with her lies; she is the one who called 911 and forced Casey to talk to them; she is the one who flatly told Casey in the beginning that she didn’t believe her.

She is now in denial.

They’re not looking for the father, because:

#1 He’s not even on the birth certificate.
#2 Evidence supports Casey’s claim that he is dead.
#3 They know that he is not responsible for Caylee’s disappearance.
4. They don’t need the father’s DNA to positively ID Caylee’s body.

Hey, cool down! I wouldn’t jump to conclusions so quickly about the people posting here.

Padilla ran his mouth off – claiming to know something about the FBI DNA analysis. MT DNA analysis is what it is and as you so – ehem – knowledgably pointed out – maternally inherited and very similar between mother and daughter.

What I think is interesting is tha Padilla is just as keen as the rest of us to figure out who the child’s father is – hoping that in the process of sorting out DHY, some clues will emerge.

Anyway, I do think Caylee’s paternity is relevant. Of the many discrepancies in the Anthony family’s collective stories, the ones about Caylee’s father are up there among the more strange/revolving. The media was reporting a few weeks back that the police were interested in Jesus Ortiz’s DNA – to prove paternity for whatever reason that might be important to them.

In the absence of a father, and obvious lies about his existance, and a missing child, I can see how that angle might need to be explored; as in: maybe Casey gave the child to her birth father and he has absconded with her. A lie is told out of necessity and needs to be looked at as a possible key to solving the situation.

anyway your “verifiable information” quote was directly from your own post…

to indulge you….here you are…

Cindy Anthony—not credible—multiple lies

1. “Smells Like there was a dead body in there….LIE…oh nevermind it was rotting pizza.”

2. I have not seen Cayle since June 9th…LIE…oh wait there is video evidence that she was with me on June 15th…WOOPS

those are a couple examples……
Like I said…Casey gave the biggest clue on the 911 call….31 days ago was the last time she saw her daughter…that was June 15th..she left her with the nanny…well guess who was her nanny CINDY…guess what? there is video PROOF Caylee was with Cindy on the 15th….maybe they should check the nursing home to see what car drove there that day…could it have been the sunfire? HMMMM>>>>>>

The list goes on….

The reason they can’t distinguish between Casey and Caylee as the donor of the hair sample is because that isn’t the kind of DNA testing they’re talking about. They’ve only tested for mitochondrial DNA on the hair sample. (At least, that’s all the information that has been made public.)

Mitochondrial DNA is NOT a complete evaluation of the sample, it seeks only to link the sample with the donor’s mother. If you were to donate a cheek swab, they could link the swab to your mother’s DNA, but the sample would not hold up in court as a thorough identification of you as the donor. Your mother or your sibling could be the donor as well. The methodology for specifically identifying you as the donor is much more thorough. (Didn’t you learn anything from the OJ trial?)

If the root is intact on the hair sample, it can SOMETIMES reveal whether the donor was dead or alive.

The investigators are not even attempting to learn the identity of Caylee’s father, because the information would be irrelevant. They don’t need a paternal swab to positively identify Caylee’s body. They have a wealth of items removed from the home, including her hairbrush and toothbrush, to identify this child’s body when she is found.

I know that there are elements in this case that seem dark and sinister beyond our imagination, and curiosity and speculation are human nature, but I promise you, only science will solve this case once and for all.

I does explain her behavior, and not being able to bond with Caylee.

It sure would be nice to hear some sort of voice of reason in all this instead of the Anthony’s flailing about.

And – Casey’s getting out again! Maybe even by tomorrow morning. Can’t wait for THAT circus to start up again!

Somehow I’ve missed the tons of “verifiable information” which suggest Cindy Anthony might be a murderer. Please, do enlighten me.

C’mon, you guys! Isn’t this crime sinister or sensational enough for you? Why in the world must we start speculating about Caylee being the product of an incestuous relationship? There is absolutely no evidence to support that. From reports I’ve heard and read, any one of a dozen men could be Caylee’s father. Can we please get back to discussing what’s actually pertinent in this case? There’s a pile of evidence the size of Mount Everest which is scientifically verifiable. Good grief, this is how urban legends get started. Someone makes an irresponsible remark, and everyone jumps on board. This child’s demise was tragic and degrading enough. Allow Caylee her dignity.

*******************************************
http://www.540wfla.com/cc-common/mainheadlines3.html?feed=227698&article=4189759

by Rozzie Franco and Nada Taha, 540 WFLA/FNN

ORLANDO, FLA. — The latest twist in the Casey Anthony case comes from the man who at one point gave her a “get out of jail free” card and may tie her brother, Lee Anthony, into the saga.

Bounty Hunter Leonard Padilla made national headlines when he bonded Anthony out of jail, but although he’s back in California, he’s not keeping himself too far away from the case of the missing 3-year-old toddler, Caylee Anthony.

Padilla said that he believes something didn’t add up about the preliminary DNA test results that came back last week from the trunk of Anthony’s car. Officials found strands of hair that they ruled could have either been Casey’s or Caylee’s.

“The Feds released information that the hair was either the mother’s or the daughter’s; they didn’t distinguish,” Padilla said. “Why would they not know whether it was the daughter or the mother? They didn’t say it was Caylee’s.”

Padilla said that officials ruled it was Caylee’s hair just by a process of elimination because the hair had a death ring around it and they know Casey is alive. The fact that the DNA is identical has something to do with who the father is, Padilla said.

“Would the DNA from a child resulting from a union from Lee and Casey have basically the same characteristics? Making the preliminary DNA check not definitive as to who the hair samples are from,” he said.

Padilla’s statements come at a time when police have filed more charges against Casey Anthony, who has already been arrested twice. Officials charged Casey Wednesday with two counts of uttering a forged check, two counts of petty theft and two counts of fraudulent use of personal identification.
****************************************

This is just bizarre.

What else would Lee, Casey, and Cindy know that would exclude George from needing to know (because he knows it already)? Or was it just an omission of Padillas?

“it is going to shock the world over something Lee, Casey and Cindy have known since Wednesday when they released their preliminary findings”…

He did not mention George Anthony’s name. It makes me wonder if George is Caylee’s father. If Casey was sexually abused from childhood, that would explain her promiscuity and if the incestuous relationship with her father continued into adulthood, combined with sleeping with other men, maybe she had no idea who the father of Caylee was (but suspected that it could be her dad). If Casey was abused in this manner, it would explain (not excuse) her sociopathic behavior.

*****************************************

from Hal Boedeker, the TV Dude at Orlando Sentinel

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2008/09/local-tv-statio.html

Wednesday was a busy night for local TV stations reporting on the Caylee Anthony story. You had the sense: Could a major break be coming?

WFTV-Channel 6 started its 6 p.m. news with by mentioning that a cadaver dog had alerted in an area near the airport. As the newscast ended, WFTV offered a bit of home video from the spot and promised more details at 11.

WFTV, WESH-Channel 2 and WKMG-Channel 6 reported that traces of potentially lethal chloroform were found in the trunk of Casey Anthony’s car. WESH and WKMG said that someone had used Casey’s computer to gain information about chloroform. It all sounded like something out of “Murder, She Wrote.”

WKMG and WFTV reported that criminal defense attorney Mark NeJame had met with grandparents Cindy and George Anthony.

According to WFTV, NeJame said the grandparents were looking for advice, not retaining his services — yet. NeJame said Casey didn’t come up in the meeting.

WFTV had a second report on whether Casey’s attorney, Jose Baez, was in over his head on the case. For analysis, WFTV turned to defense attorney Richard Hornsby, who observed the case has become “a PR nightmare.” (I think Hornsby could have a future in TV, if he wanted one.)

WKMG said NeJame confirmed he was meeting with the grandparents “about something other than Casey and Caylee.” That was information sure to set off more speculation.

WKMG also had Orange County Sheriff Kevin Beary’s response to Cindy Anthony’s demand for an apology. She said Beary was grandstanding in the way Casey was arrested Friday night.

Beary’s response: “Won’t happen. Won’t happen. We’re doing our job.”

WESH explained that six new counts to do with economic crimes had been filed against Casey. “This young lady definitely has got a bit of a criminal past,” Beary said.

Do you sense that this story is at a turning point?